Shortcuts To JN0-696（1 to 10）

Exam Code: JN0-696 (Practice Exam Latest Test Questions VCE PDF)
Exam Name: Security Support, Professional (JNCSP-SEC)
Certification Provider: Juniper
Free Today! Guaranteed Training- Pass JN0-696 Exam.

2021 Nov JN0-696 exam answers

Q1. While attempting to set up IDP on an SRX Series device, the IDP attack database fails to download.

What is one reason for this behavior?

A. The device's Untrust zone to Trust zone security policy does not allow this traffic.

B. The device's configuration does not include the URL from which to retrieve the attack database.

C. A firewall filter applied to the loopback interface is preventing the download of the attack database.

D. The host inbound traffic has not been configured correctly.

Answer: C

Q2. -- Exhibit –

-- Exhibit --

Click the Exhibit button.

There is an existing chassis cluster connected to the corporate network 192.168.1.0/24. You are asked to connect another department to this VLAN. To achieve this, you add a new chassis cluster to the network. After connecting to the network, the cluster experiences traffic problems. You have

verified that the addresses and VLAN IDs are configured correctly. Referring to the exhibit, which configuration would resolve this problem?

A. user@SRX-3> set chassis cluster cluster-id 1 node 0 reboot user@SRX-4> set chassis cluster cluster-id 1 node 1 reboot

B. user@SRX-3# set chassis cluster redundancy-group 1 node 0 priority 100 user@SRX-3# commit

C. user@SRX-3# set chassis cluster redundancy-group 1 preempt user@SRX-3# commit

D. user@SRX-3> set chassis cluster cluster-id 2 node 0 reboot user@SRX-4> set chassis cluster cluster-id 2 node 1 reboot

Answer: D

Q3. -- Exhibit --

user@host> show security flow session

...

Session ID. 41, Policy name: allow/5, Timeout: 20, Valid In: 172.168.66.143/43886 --> 192.168.100.1/5000;tcp, If: ge-0/0/1.0, Pkts: 1, Bytes: 60 Out: 10.100.1.100/5555 --> 172.168.66.143/43886;tcp, If: ge-0/0/2.0, Pkts: 0, Bytes: 0

user@host> show configuration

...

security

{ nat { destination { pool server { address 10.100.1.100/32 port 5555; } rule-set rule1 { from zone UNTRUST; rule 1 { match { destination-address 192.168.100.1/32; destination-port 5000; } then { destination-nat pool server; } } } } proxy-arp {

interface ge-0/0/1.0 {

address {

192.168.100.1/32;

}

policies {

from-zone UNTRUST to-zone TRUST {

policy allow {

match {

source-address any; destination-

address any; application [ junos-ping tcp-5000 ];

}

then {

permit;

}

zones {

security-zone TRUST {

interfaces {

ge-0/0/2.0 {

host-inbound-traffic {

protocols {

interface ge-0/0/1.0 {all; } } } } } security-zone UNTRUST { interfaces { ge-0/0/1.0 { host-inbound-traffic { system-services { ping; } } } } } }

}

applications { application tcp-5000 { protocol tcp; destination-port 5000; }

}

-- Exhibit --

Click the Exhibit button. Your customer is attempting to reach your new server that should be accessible publicly using

192.168.100.100 on TCP port 5000, and internally using 10.100.100.1 on TCP port 5555. You notice a session forms when they attempt to access the server, but they are unable to reach the server.

Referring to the exhibit, what will resolve this problem?

A. There must be a TRUST-to-UNTRUST security policy to allow return traffic.

B. The NAT pool server address must be changed to 10.100.100.1/32.

C. The NAT pool server port must be changed to 5000.

D. The NAT rule set rule1 must match on address 172.168.66.143.

Answer: B

Q4. -- Exhibit -- {hold:node0} user@host1> show chassis cluster status Cluster ID. 1 Node Priority Status Preempt Manual failover

Redundancy group: 0 , Failover count: 0 node0 1 hold no no node1 0 lost n/a n/a {hold:node0}

user@host1> show configuration | no-more

system { host-name host1; root-authentication { encrypted-password "$1$KI99zGk6$MbYFuBbpLffu9tn2.sI7l1"; ## SECRET-DATA } name-server { 172.16.10.100; } services { ssh; telnet; web-management { http; } } syslog { user * { any emergency; } file messages { any any; authorization info; } file interactive-commands { interactive-commands any;

}

} } interfaces

{ ge-0/0/0

{ unit 0

{ family inet

{

address 10.210.14.131/26;

}

ge-0/0/8

{ unit 0

{ family inet

{

address 172.16.1.1/24;

}

ge-0/0/9

{ unit 0

{ family inet

{

address 172.16.10.1/24;

}

security

{ policies

{ default-policy

{ permit-all;

}

zones {

functional-zone management {

interfaces {

ge-0/0/0.0;

}

host-inbound-traffic

{ system-services

{ ssh;

telnet; ping;

traceroute;

http;

snmp;

}

security-zone Trust

{ host-inbound-traffic

{ system-services

{ any-service;

} } interfaces { ge-0/0/9.0; } } security-zone Untrust { host-inbound-traffic { system-services { any-service; } } interfaces { ge-0/0/8.0; } } }

}

{hold:node1} user@host2> show chassis cluster status Cluster ID. 1 Node Priority Status Preempt Manual failover

Redundancy group: 0 , Failover count: 0 node0 0 lost n/a n/a node1 1 hold no no

{hold:node1}

user@host2> show configuration | no-more

system { host-name host2; root-authentication { encrypted-password "$1$KI99zGk6$MbYFuBbpLffu9tn2.sI7l1"; ## SECRET-DATA } name-server { 172.16.10.100; } services { ssh; telnet; web-management { http; } } syslog { user * { any emergency; } file messages { any any; authorization info; } file interactive-commands {

interactive-commands any;

}

} } interfaces

{ ge-0/0/0

{ unit 0

{ family inet

{

address 10.210.14.132/26;

}

ge-0/0/8

{ unit 0

{ family inet

{

address 172.16.1.1/24;

}

ge-0/0/9

{ unit 0

{ family inet

{

address 172.16.10.1/24;

}

security

{ policies

{ default-policy

{ permit-all;

}

zones {

functional-zone management {

interfaces {

ge-0/0/0.0;

}

host-inbound-traffic

{ system-services

{ ssh;

telnet; ping;

traceroute;

http;

snmp;

}

security-zone Trust

{ host-inbound-traffic

{ system-services

{ any-service; } } interfaces { ge-0/0/9.0; } } security-zone Untrust { host-inbound-traffic { system-services { any-service; } } interfaces { ge-0/0/8.0; } } }

}

-- Exhibit --

Click the Exhibit button.

A user attempted to form a chassis cluster on an SRX240; however, the cluster did not form. While investigating the problem, you see the output shown in the exhibit.

What is causing the problem?

A. The cluster IDs do not match.

B. The configurations are not identical.

C. The fxp0 interface is not configured.

D. D. The ge-0/0/0 interface is configured.

Answer: D

Q5. You want to allow remote users using PCs running Windows 7 to access the network using an IPsec VPN. You implement a route-based hub-and-spoke VPN; however, users report that they are not able to access the network.

What is causing this problem?

A. The remote clients do not have proper licensing.

B. Hub-and-spoke VPNs cannot be route-based; they must be policy-based.

C. The remote clients' OS is not supported.

D. Hub-and-spoke VPNs do not support remote client access; a dynamic VPN must be implemented instead.

Answer: B

Latest JN0-696 free question:

Q6. -- Exhibit -- user@R1> show log ike-trace Jun 13 07:45:10 ikev2_packet_v1_start: Passing IKE v1.0 packet to IKEv1 library Jun 13 07:45:10 ike_get_sA. Start, SA = { 7fd86fbe 8a99c1f6 - 00000000 00000000 } / 00000000,

remote = 184.0.15.2:500 Jun 13 07:45:10 ike_sa_allocate: Start, SA = { 7fd86fbe 8a99c1f6 - a1bc3f1d e2a45308 } Jun 13 07:45:10 ike_init_isakmp_sA. Start, remote = 184.0.15.2:500, initiator = 0 Jun 13 07:45:10 ike_decode_packet: Start Jun 13 07:45:10 ike_decode_packet: Start, SA = { 7fd86fbe 8a99c1f6 - b8f95b2e f92ca733} /

00000000, nego = -1

Jun 13 07:45:10 ike_decode_payload_sA. Start

Jun 13 07:45:10 ike_decode_payload_t: Start, # trans = 1

Jun 13 07:45:10 ike_st_i_viD. VID[0..16] = afcad713 68a1f1c9 ...

Jun 13 07:45:10 ike_st_i_viD. VID[0..16] = 27bab5dc 01ea0760 ...

Jun 13 07:45:10 ike_st_i_viD. VID[0..16] = 6105c422 e76847e4 ...

Jun 13 07:45:10 ike_st_i_viD. VID[0..16] = 4485152d 18b6bbcd ...

Jun 13 07:45:10 ike_st_i_viD. VID[0..16] = cd604643 35df21f8 ...

Jun 13 07:45:10 ike_st_i_viD. VID[0..16] = 90cb8091 3ebb696e ...

Jun 13 07:45:10 ike_st_i_viD. VID[0..16] = 7d9419a6 5310ca6f ...

Jun 13 07:45:10 ike_st_i_viD. VID[0..16] = 4a131c81 07035845 ...

Jun 13 07:45:10 ike_st_i_viD. VID[0..28] = 69936922 8741c6d4 ...

Jun 13 07:45:10 ike_st_i_sa_proposal: Start

Jun 13 07:45:10 P1 SA payload match failed for sa-cfg to-R2. Abortingnegotiation for tunnel type 2

local:184.0.15.1 remote:184.0.15.2 IKEv1.

Jun 13 07:45:10 iked_pm_ike_spd_select_ike_sa failed. rc 1, error_code: No proposal chosen

Jun 13 07:45:10 ikev2_fb_spd_select_sa_cB. IKEv2 SA select failed with error No proposal

chosen (neg a7e800)

Jun 13 07:45:10 ike_isakmp_sa_reply: Start

Jun 13 07:45:10 ike_state_restart_packet: Start, restart packet SA = { 7fd86fbe 8a99c1f6 -

b8f95b2e f92ca733}, nego = -1

Jun 13 07:45:10 ike_st_i_sa_proposal: Start

Jun 13 07:45:10 ike_st_i_cr: Start Jun

13 07:45:10 ike_st_i_cert: Start Jun 13

07:45:10 ike_st_i_private: Start Jun 13 07:45:10 ike_st_o_sa_values: Start Jun 13 07:45:10 184.0.15.1:500 (Responder) -> 184.0.15.2:500 { 7fd86fbe 8a99c1f6 - b8f95b2e

f92ca733 [-1] / 0x00000000 } IP; Error = No proposal chosen (14)

Jun 13 07:45:10 ike_alloc_negotiation: Start, SA = { 7fd86fbe 8a99c1f6 - b8f95b2e f92ca733}

Jun 13 07:45:10 ike_encode_packet: Start, SA = { 0x7fd86fbe 8a99c1f6 - b8f95b2e f92ca733 } /

b20d590c, nego = 0

Jun 13 07:45:10 ike_send_packet: Start, send SA = { 7fd86fbe 8a99c1f6 - b8f95b2e f92ca733},

nego = 0, dst = 184.0.15.2:500, routing table id = 0

Jun 13 07:45:10 ike_delete_negotiation: Start, SA = { 7fd86fbe 8a99c1f6 - b8f95b2e f92ca733},

nego = 0

Jun 13 07:45:10 ike_free_negotiation_info: Start, nego = 0

Jun 13 07:45:10 ike_free_negotiation: Start, nego = 0

Jun 13 07:45:10 IKE negotiation fail for local:184.0.15.1, remote:184.0.15.2 IKEv1 with status: No

proposal chosen

Jun 13 07:45:10 IKEv1 Error : No proposal chosen

Jun 13 07:45:40 P1 SA 3770105 timer expiry. ref cnt 1, timer reason Force delete timer expired

(1), flags 0x330.

Jun 13 07:45:40 iked_pm_ike_sa_delete_done_cB. For p1 sa index 3770105, ref cnt 1, status:

Error ok

Jun 13 07:45:40 ike_remove_callback: Start, delete SA = { 7fd86fbe 8a99c1f6 - b8f95b2e

f92ca733}, nego = -1

Jun 13 07:45:40 ike_delete_negotiation: Start, SA = { 7fd86fbe 8a99c1f6 - b8f95b2e f92ca733},

nego = -1

Jun 13 07:45:40 ssh_ike_tunnel_table_entry_delete: Deleting tunnel_iD. 0 from IKE tunnel table

Jun 13 07:45:40 ssh_ike_tunnel_table_entry_delete: The tunnel iD. 0 doesn't exist in IKE tunnel

table

Jun 13 07:45:40 ike_sa_delete: Start, SA = { 7fd86fbe 8a99c1f6 - b8f95b2e f92ca733 }

Jun 13 07:45:40 ike_free_negotiation_isakmp: Start, nego = -1

Jun 13 07:45:40 ike_free_negotiation: Start, nego = -1

Jun 13 07:45:40 IKE SA delete called for p1 sa 3770105 (ref cnt 1) local:184.0.15.1,

remote:184.0.15.2, IKEv1

Jun 13 07:45:40 iked_pm_p1_sa_destroy: p1 sa 3770105 (ref cnt 0), waiting_for_del 0x0

Jun 13 07:45:40 ike_free_sA. Start

-- Exhibit --

Click the Exhibit button.

You are asked to troubleshoot a new IPsec VPN between R1 and R2 that is not coming up. You have captured the traceoptions output shown in the exhibit.

What is the reason for the problem?

A. IKE Phase 2 proposal mismatch

B. IKE preshared key mismatch

C. IKE Phase 1 proposal mismatch

D. IKE Phase 1 mode mismatch

Answer: C

Q7. -- Exhibit -- user@host> show log ibgp-trace ... Jun 12 10:21:08 10:21:08.367627:CID-0:RT:192.168.2.1/49170->192.168.1.1/179;6> matched

filter ibgp-traffic:

Jun 12 10:21:08 10:21:08.367747:CID-0:RT:packet [64] ipid = 11792, @423f741c

Jun 12 10:21:08 10:21:08.367747:CID-0:RT:---- flow_process_pkt: (thd 2): flow_ctxt type 15,

common flag 0x0, mbuf 0x423f7200, rtbl_idx = 0 Jun 12 10:21:08 10:21:08.367747:CID-0:RT: flow process pak fast ifl 71 in_ifp ge-0/0/3.0 Jun 12 10:21:08 10:21:08.367747:CID-0:RT: ge-0/0/3.0:192.168.2.1/49170->192.168.1.1/179,

tcp, flag 2 syn

Jun 12 10:21:08 10:21:08.367747:CID-0:RT: find flow: table 0x4f161150, hash 15898(0xffff), sa 192.168.2.1, da 192.168.1.1, sp 49170, dp 179, proto 6, tok 7 Jun 12 10:21:08 10:21:08.367747:CID-0:RT: no session found, start first path. in_tunnel - 0,

from_cp_flag - 0

Jun 12 10:21:08 10:21:08.367747:CID-0:RT: flow_first_create_session Click the Exhibit button.Jun 12 10:21:08 10:21:08.367747:CID-0:RT:Doing DESTINATION addr route-lookup Jun 12 10:21:08 10:21:08.367747:CID-0:RT: routed (x_dst_ip 192.168.1.1) from trust (ge-0/0/3.0 in 0) to lo0.0, Next-hop: 92.168.1.1 Jun 12 10:21:08 10:21:08.367747:CID-0:RT:flow_first_policy_search: policy search from zone trust-> zone loopback-zone (0x0,0xc01200b3,0xb3) Jun 12 10:21:08 10:21:08.367747:CID-0:RT: policy has timeout 900 Jun 12 10:21:08 10:21:08.367747:CID-0:RT: app 0, timeout 1800s, curr ageout 20s Jun 12 10:21:08 10:21:08.367747:CID-0:RT: permitted by policy allow-bgp(8) Jun 12 10:21:08 10:21:08.368250:CID-0:RT: flow_first_install_session======> 0x5394a110 Jun 12 10:21:08 10:21:08.368250:CID-0:RT:flow_first_service_lookup(): natp(0x5394a110): app_id, 0(0). Jun 12 10:21:08 10:21:08.368250:CID-0:RT: service lookup identified service 0. Jun 12 10:21:08 10:21:08.368250:CID-0:RT: flow_first_final_check: in 0/3.0>, out Jun 12 10:21:08 10:21:08.368250:CID-0:RT: existing vector list 2-49c75930. Jun 12 10:21:08 10:21:08.368250:CID-0:RT: Session (id:137) created for first pak 2 Jun 12 10:21:08 10:21:08.368250:CID-0:RT: post addr xlation: 192.168.2.1->192.168.1.1. Jun 12 10:21:08 10:21:08.368250:CID-0:RT:check self-traffic on lo0.0, in_tunnel 0x0 Jun 12 10:21:08 10:21:08.368250:CID-0:RT:retcode: 0xa01 Jun 12 10:21:08 10:21:08.368250:CID-0:RT:pak_for_self : proto 6, dst port 179, action 0x0 Jun 12 10:21:08 10:21:08.368250:CID-0:RT: flow_first_create_session Jun 12 10:21:08 10:21:08.368250:CID-0:RT: flow_first_in_dst_nat: in , out A> dst_adr 192.168.1.1, sp 49170, dp 179 Jun 12 10:21:08 10:21:08.368752:CID-0:RT: chose interface lo0.0 as incoming nat if. Jun 12 10:21:08 10:21:08.368752:CID-0:RT: packet droppeD. for self but not interested Jun 12 10:21:08 10:21:08.368752:CID-0:RT: packet dropped, packet droppeD. for self but not interested. Jun 12 10:21:08 10:21:08.368752:CID-0:RT: flow find session returns error. Jun 12 10:21:08 10:21:08.368752:CID-0:RT: ----- flow_process_pkt rc 0x7 (fp rc -1) -- Exhibit -- Click the Exhibit button.

You are asked to troubleshoot a new IBGP peering problem on your SRX Series device. The IBGP peering is not establishing.

Referring to the outputs in the exhibit, what is causing the problem?

A. The traffic is not being accepted by the security policy.

B. NAT is translating the destination IP addresses.

C. The loopback interface does not have the correct IP address assigned to it.

D. The host inbound traffic configuration does not include the BGP parameter.

Answer: D

Q8. -- Exhibit -- user@host> show log flow.log Jun 12 20:00:45 host clear-log[ ]: logfile cleared Jun 12 20:01:10 20:01:10.412643:CID-0:RT:172.23.1.20/2526->10.3.202.56/443;6> matched filter

to_https: ...

Jun 12 20:01:10 20:01:10.412643:CID-0:RT: fe-0/0/6.0:172.23.1.20/2526->10.3.202.56/443, tcp, flag 2 syn

...

Jun 12 20:01:10 20:01:10.412643:CID-0:RT:check self-traffic on fe-0/0/6.0, in_tunnel 0x0

...

Jun 12 20:01:10 20:01:10.412643:CID-0:RT:flow_first_rule_dst_xlate: DST xlate: 10.3.202.56(443) to 10.25.0.3(443), rule/pool id 2/2.

Jun 12 20:01:10 20:01:10.412643:CID-0:RT:flow_first_routing: vr_id 0, call flow_route_lookup(): src_ip 172.23.1.20, x_dst_ip 10.25.0.3, in ifp fe-0/0/6.0, out ifp N/A sp 2526, dp 443, ip_proto 6, tos 0

Jun 12 20:01:10 20:01:10.412643:CID-0:RT:Doing DESTINATION addr route-lookup

Jun 12 20:01:10 20:01:10.412643:CID-0:RT: routed (x_dst_ip 10.25.0.3) from managed (fe- 0/0/6.0 in 0) to ge-0/0/1.4093, Next-hop: 10.25.0.3

Jun 12 20:01:10 20:01:10.412643:CID-0:RT:flow_first_policy_search: policy search from zone managed-> zone trust (0x110,0x9de01bb,0x1bb)

Jun 12 20:01:10 20:01:10.412643:CID-0:RT: app 58, timeout 1800s, curr ageout 20s

Jun 12 20:01:10 20:01:10.412643:CID-0:RT: permitted by policy default-policy-00(2)

...

Jun 12 20:01:10 20:01:10.412643:CID-0:RT:flow_xlate_pak

Jun 12 20:01:10 20:01:10.412643:CID-0:RT: post addr xlation: 172.23.1.20->10.25.0.3.

Jun 12 20:01:10 20:01:10.412643:CID-0:RT:skip pre-frag: is_tunnel_if- 0, is_if_mtu_configured- 0

Jun 12 20:01:10 20:01:10.412643:CID-0:RT:mbuf 0x42344180, exit nh 0xb00010

Jun 12 20:01:10 20:01:10.412643:CID-0:RT: ----- flow_process_pkt rc 0x0 (fp rc 0)

-- Exhibit --

Click the Exhibit button.

You want to allow Web-based management of your SRX Series device through fe-0/0/6.0. This interface belongs to the managed zone with an IP address of 10.3.202.56. You are unable to open an HTTPS connection and have enabled traceoptions to troubleshoot the problem.

Referring to the exhibit, what is causing this problem?

A. The HTTPS protocol is not enabled in the managed zone.

B. The HTTPS protocol is not enabled in the trust zone.

C. The lo0 interface is not configured in the managed zone.

D. The packet was diverted to the wrong zone.

Answer: D

Q9. -- Exhibit --

[edit security utm]

user@host# show

custom-objects

{ url-pattern

{ blocklist { value [ http://badsite.com http://blocksite.com ]; } acceptlist { value http://juniper.net; } } custom-url-category { blacklist { value blocklist; } whitelist { value acceptlist; } }

}

feature-profile { web-filtering { url-whitelist whitelist; url-blacklist blacklist; type juniper-local; juniper-local {

profile web-filter {

custom-block-message "Site is not allowed";

fallback-settings {

default log-and-permit;

}

utm-policy utm1 {

web-filtering {

http-profile web-filter;

}

-- Exhibit --

Click the Exhibit button.

You set up Web filtering to allow employees to only access your internal website. You notice that employees are still able to reach websites outside of the blacklists.

Referring the exhibit, which parameter must be changed?

A. You must define all sites you want to block using the mime-pattern parameter.

B. You must change the fallback-settings parameter to default block.

C. You must use integrated or redirect Web filtering instead of local list filtering.

D. You must define all sites you want to block using the protocol-command parameter.

Answer: B

Q10. -- Exhibit -- user@SRX-1> show configuration security ike traceoptions {

file ike-trace;

flag all; } policy juniper {

proposal-set standard;

pre-shared-key ascii-text "$ $ znCO hKMXtuMX - gTz "; ## SECRET-DATA } gateway juniper { ike-

policy juniper; address 192.168.1.11; external-interface fe-0/0/7;

} user@SRX-1> show configuration security ipsec traceoptions {

flag all; } policy juniper {

proposal-set standard; } vpn juniper {

bind-interface st0.0; ike { gateway juniper; ipsec-policy juniper; }

}

user@SRX-1> show security ike security-associations

user@SRX-1> show security ipsec security-associations Total active tunnels: 0

user@SRX-1> show log ike-trace

...

Jun 13 16:21:33 ike_st_o_all_done: MESSAGE: Phase 1 { 0x3f669946 90eba0c7 - 0x76bdffab f8770040 } / 00000000, version = 1.0, xchg = Identity protect, auth_method = Pre shared keys, Responder, cipher = 3des-cbc, hash = sha1, prf = hmac-sha1, life = 0 kB / 28800 sec, key l Jun 13 16:21:33 192.168.1.10:500 (Responder) -> 192.168.1.11:500 { 3f669946 90eba0c7 - 76bdffab f8770040 [-1] / 0x00000000 } IP; MESSAGE: Phase 1 version = 1.0, auth_method = Pre shared keys, cipher = 3des-cbc, hash = sha1, prf = hmac-sha1, life = 0 kB / 28800 sec, key

Jun 13 16:21:33 ike_encode_packet: Start, SA = { 0x3f669946 90eba0c7 - 76bdffab f8770040 } / 00000000, nego = -1

Jun 13 16:21:33 ike_send_packet: Start, send SA = { 3f669946 90eba0c7 - 76bdffab f8770040}, nego = -1, dst = 192.168.1.11:500, routing table id = 0

Jun 13 16:21:33 ike_send_notify: Connected, SA = { 3f669946 90eba0c7 - 76bdffab f8770040}, nego = -1

Jun 13 16:21:33 iked_pm_ike_sa_done: local:192.168.1.10, remote:192.168.1.11 IKEv1

Jun 13 16:21:33 iked_pm_id_validate id NOT matched.

Jun 13 16:21:33 P1 SA 3075313 timer expiry. ref cnt 1, timer reason Defer delete timer expired (3), flags 0x331.

Jun 13 16:21:33 iked_pm_ike_sa_delete_notify_done_cB. For p1 sa index 3075313, ref cnt 1, status: Error ok

Jun 13 16:21:33 ike_expire_callback: Start, expire SA = { 3f669946 90eba0c7 - 76bdffab f8770040}, nego = -1

Jun 13 16:21:33 ike_alloc_negotiation: Start, SA = { 3f669946 90eba0c7 - 76bdffab f8770040}

...

-- Exhibit --

Click the Exhibit button.

You are troubleshooting a new IPsec VPN that is not establishing between SRX-1 and a remote end device.

Referring to the exhibit, what is causing the problem?

A. Pre-shared key mismatch

B. IKE Phase 1 proposals mismatch

C. IKE Phase 1 IKE ID mismatch

D. IKE Phase 2 proxy ID mismatch

Answer: C

2021 Nov JN0-696 exam answers

Latest JN0-696 free question:

To see all sample questions go to: JN0-696 braindumps

Related JN0-696 posts: